H ere an attempt to visualise what I was up to in 2014 publishing, research and teaching engagement wise. I have focused first on how many blog posts I published on this blog per month, how many blog posts I edited and/or authored for the Comics Grid blog, how many outputs I shared on figshare and finally a general numeralia of some main categories of my 2014 activity.
** ** A n 2014 annual report for this blog courtesy of WordPress.com. Click here to see the complete report. Here’s an excerpt: Click here to see the complete report .
{.alignnone .size-full .wp-image-3035 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“3035” permalink=“http://ernestopriego.com/2014/12/18/the-ref-according-to-twitter-a-ref2014-update-181214-1628-gmt/cirrus-word-cloud-visualisation-of-a-corpus-of-23791-ref2014-tweets/” orig-file=“https://epriego.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/cirrus-word-cloud-visualisation-of-a-corpus-of-23791-ref2014-tweets.png” orig-size=“1229,595” comments-opened=“0”
A s everyone in some way aware of UK higher education knows, the results from the REF 2014 were announced in the first minute of the 18th of december 2014. Two main hashtags have been used to refer to it on Twitter; #REF and the more popular (“official”?) #REF2014. There’s been of course other variations of these hashtags, including discussion about it not ‘hashing’ the term REF at all.
{.alignnone .size-medium .wp-image-3029 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“3029” permalink=“http://ernestopriego.com/2014/12/17/hefce-metrics-a-one-day-workshop-hosted-by-the-university-of-warwick/screen-shot-2014-12-17-at-10-41-46/” orig-file=“https://epriego.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/screen-shot-2014-12-17-at-10-41-46.png” orig-size=“436,125” comments-opened=“0”
{.size-full .wp-image-3022 aria-describedby=“caption-attachment-3022” loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“3022” permalink=“http://ernestopriego.com/2014/12/16/just-landed-on-a-comet-a-cometlanding-archive/r_17-15-00_jx7enjy6ac/” orig-file=“https://epriego.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/r_17-15-00_jx7enjy6ac.png” orig-size=“634,452” comments-opened=“0”
{.alignnone .size-medium .wp-image-3017 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“3017” permalink=“http://ernestopriego.com/2014/12/12/a-citylis-2014-2015-term-1-twitter-archive/2013-02-13-19-28-46-2/” orig-file=“https://epriego.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/2013-02-13-19-28-46.jpg” orig-size=“461,346” comments-opened=“0”
[F or context, please see this and this]. If you are new to altmetrics please read: “What does Altmetric do?” https://www.altmetric.com/whatwedo.php and “How is the Altmetric score calculated?”, http://support.altmetric.com/knowledgebase/articles/83337-how-is-the-altmetric-score-calculated {.alignnone .size-large .wp-image-3009 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“3009”
Y esterday I published a post with some initial readings of the Altmetric 2014 Top 100 articles (I’ll be calling them “outputs” as some are not versions of record). [If you are new to altmetrics please read: “What does Altmetric do?” https://www.altmetric.com/whatwedo.php and “How is the Altmetric score calculated?”, http://support.altmetric.com/knowledgebase/articles/83337-how-is-the-altmetric-score-calculated] I am interested
T he London-based article-level metrics provider Altmetric published a list of their top 100 highest-scoring articles yesterday (access the full Top 100 list). For essential context, please read the accompanying blog post by Cat Chimes here, as well as her “Unwanted attention?” November 14 2014 post here. This recent post on how Altmetric tracks global news will also be relevant to understand the context of the list.
