This post is part of an ongoing series where I intend to develop my full personal ( not institutional) response to the HE Green Paper. Comments are welcome to refine this. The Green Paper asks in Question 16: To address each of the measures in turn: “Allowing designation applications from new providers throughout the year, hence meaning that timing of the HER would no longer prevent an AP from accessing a specific ‘window’”.

This post is part of an ongoing series where I intend to develop my full personal ( not institutional) response to the HE Green Paper. Comments are welcome to refine this.

This post is part of an ongoing series where I intend to develop my full personal ( not institutional) response to the HE Green Paper. Comments are welcome to refine this. The Green Paper asks in Question 14: I do not agree with the proposed single route and here present the evidence that it will not deliver the government’s stated goals.

This post is part of an ongoing series where I intend to develop my full personal ( not institutional) response to the HE Green Paper. Comments are welcome to refine this. The Green Paper asks in Question 12: Provisional response: a.) I think, in general, that the proposals to further improve access are laudable.

This post is part of an ongoing series where I intend to develop my full personal ( not institutional) response to the HE Green Paper. Comments are welcome to refine this. The Green Paper asks in Question 13: Provisional response: a.) Clearly, better data in this respect will allow for better monitoring of access. b.) There will, of course, be additional administrative costs in providing data and contextualising them.

This post is part of an ongoing series where I intend to develop my full personal ( not institutional) response to the HE Green Paper. Comments are welcome to refine this.

This post is part of an ongoing series where I intend to develop my full personal ( not institutional) response to the HE Green Paper. Comments are welcome to refine this. The Green Paper asks in Question 10: Beyond the obvious lack of detail here on how any of these components can be meaningfully measured, there are substantial problems with the proposed areas of focus for a proposed TEF.

This post is part of an ongoing series where I intend to develop my full personal ( not institutional) response to the HE Green Paper. Comments are welcome to refine this. The Green Paper asks in Question 9: No. The proposed incentives offered for different providers in a proposed TEF are uneven.

This post is part of an ongoing series where I intend to develop my full personal ( not institutional) response to the HE Green Paper. Comments are welcome to refine this. The Green Paper asks in Question 8: Aside from my broader concerns about a potential TEF, there is one aspect here that I disagree with.

This post is part of an ongoing series where I intend to develop my full personal ( not institutional) response to the HE Green Paper. Comments are welcome to refine this. The Green Paper asks in Question 7: Provisional response: There is no central system of audit that can be administratively and financially free of costs.