Tobias Steiner

Dies ist ein re-post eines im Open-Media-Studies-Blog der Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft erschienenen dreiteiligen Beitrags. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59350/x22x0-ssg57

Old Traditions: Scholar-Led Publishing und Open Access — Zu den Anfängen digitalen scholar-led Publishings in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften (Teil 2)

Dies ist ein re-post eines im Open-Media-Studies-Blog der Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft erschienenen dreiteiligen Beitrags. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59350/h60ft-1y776    Der vorliegende Beitrag nahm im ersten Teil eine Einordnung von scholar-led publishing und dessen Situierung im Kontext von Open Access vor.

New Communities: Scholar-led Publishing und Open Access — Aktuelle scholar-led Publishing-Initiativen und Open Access in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften (Teil 3)

Overview of scholar-led initiatives (journals, book publishers, and consortia / network initiatives) in the Humanities and Social Sciences, with a focus on Cultural and Media Studies.

﻿﻿ H5P-Timeline “Scholar-led Initiatives in the Humanities and Social Sciences” by Tobias Steiner is licensed under a CC BY SA 4.0 International Licence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59350/bwqyw-k5k34 A bibliography of research on scholar-led publishing is available as a dedicated Zotero collection.

 List of initiatives below, navigate to: scholar-led journals  |

scholar-led initiatives: History and recent examples from Cultural and Media Studies

Updated for Open Access Week 2021. H5P timeline “Open Source, Open Access &amp; Open Scholarship” by Tobias Steiner is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This timeline has first been developed as a supporting document to our collaborative paper (featured on page 6): &gt; Tennant, Jonathan, Ritwik Agarwal, Ksenija Baždarić, David Brassard, Tom Crick, Daniel J. Dunleavy, Thomas R. Evans, et al. 2020.

Timeline: Open Source, Open Access &amp; Open Scholarship

H5P-Timeline “Development of OER in Germany” by Tobias Steiner is licensed under a CC BY SA 4.0 International Licence.

Timeline: Development of OER in Germany

updated: Dec 28, 2023

 Please feel free to leave suggestions, critical notes, etc. via hypothes.is comments (see Annotation sidebar tab on the top-right of your screen) and I’ll make sure to add these to the main text.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59350/6zvzt-94273 Table of Contents BigBlueButton — video alternative for teaching, learning, collaboration in projects, etc.

Community-run open source tools for video, text, and code collaboration

first published on the OpenScienceMOOC blog, Sept 03, 2019 doi: https://doi.org/10.59350/26vrh-8ey10 tldr;

first published on the OpenScienceMOOC blog, Sept 03, 2019


 doi:

https://doi.org/10.59350/26vrh-8ey10

 tldr;

The need to empower scholars as well as the general public to practice Open Scholarship has been a recurring theme in public scholarly discourse of the last decade and beyond.

Teaching practices &amp; values of Open Science and Scholarship needs open infrastructure!

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59350/dxdqq-e4n18

 Invited ignition talk at the Leibniz Research Alliance OpenScience research symposium “Open Practices IN Education (OPINE)”, November 14-15, 2019, Frankfurt/Main (Germany).

Slides: Links: symposium abstracts available online on Zenodo extended bibliography, see the open library at Zotero Abstract Today, and more than ever, “Open” is

 en vogue

and

 yum!

– a generously-applied

What do we talk about when we talk about “Open”? On Education, Science, Research, and Open Scholarship

The year 2019 has not been kind to the Open Content community, particularly for those wanting to use CC0-/public domain-licensed images for remixing in presentations, websites, etc.

Looking for pubic domain images to use for Open Content? (2019 edition)

Open Scholarship (my preferred definition) Open Scholarship as a paradigm consists of three dimensions:

 Open output

, comprising specific content / products from the fields of open publishing, open data, open source, open education, open access, and similar open movements.

Open Scholarship: A definition

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59350/nppvw-knx22  The following segments exemplify output generated by instances of TAGSExplorer, a Google Docs script that has been developed by Martin Hawksey (on Twitter: @mhawksey.

Experimenting with Twitter data and Google Sheets via TAGSExplorer

Embracing Messiness: Open access offers the chance to creatively experiment with scholarly publishing.

Impact of Social Sciences

Scaling Small; Or How to Envision New Relationalities for Knowledge Production

Changing Publishing Ecologies: A Landscape Study of New University Presses and Academic-Led Publishing

Interview with Paul Ashton, co-founder of re.press

Governing Scholar-Led OA Book Publishers: Values, Practices, Barriers

Common Struggles: Policy-based vs. scholar-led approaches to open access in the humanities

Open *By* Whom? On the Meaning of 'Scholar-Led'

From Sustainable Publishing To Resilient Communications

This cross-post has originally been published on the ScholarLed blog. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59350/2z69g-xbz37  Over the last few years, I have had the opportunity to closely follow the work of a variety of community- and scholar-led publishing initiatives, while also becoming more deeply involved with a few of them.

Lost in translation? Revisiting notions of community- and scholar-led publishing in international contexts

Dies ist ein re-post eines im Open-Media-Studies-Blog der Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft erschienenen dreiteiligen Beitrags. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59350/mybsy-e9g15  Publikationskulturen sind im Wissenschaftsbetrieb ähnlich vielfältig wie die ihnen zugrundeliegenden Forschungskulturen.

Pluralities: Scholar-Led Publishing und Open Access — zur Rolle von scholar-led publishing in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften (Teil 1)

Versionshistorie Beachte, dass Versionen dieses Dokuments auch in anderen Sprachen wie Spanisch, Indonesisch und natürlich im englischen Original existieren.

Versionshistorie  Version 1.0 — 16. Oktober 2017 – Erste Version des Dokuments. Version 1.1 — 06. Juni 2018 – Website erstellt.

Grundlagen für die Entwicklung einer Open Scholarship-Strategie

Flavours of Open

### Open Scholarship (my preferred definition)

[Open Scholarship](https://doi.org/10.32388/282729) as a paradigm
consists of three dimensions:

1.  **Open output**, comprising specific content / products from the
    fields of open publishing, open data, open source, open education,
    open access, and similar open movements.
2.  **Open practices**, describing how those working in and with
    academia search and find, (co-)create and disseminate the elements
    of 1), such as e.g. open science practices for research-focused
    activities; open teaching and learning in its many facets including
    open educational practices and open pedagogy; citizen science;
    scholarly communication, outreach and collaboration.
3.  **Open networked participation**, as a set of underlying practices
    that frame scholars' and other inolved parties' uses of digital
    technologies and that are informed by certain grounding assumptions
    and values regarding accessibility, democratization, justice and the
    assertion of fundamental human rights via the spread of equitable
    knowledge along its life-cycle of creation, dissemination and re-use
    along. Open networked participation is a process happening under
    constant negotiation of one's and others' personal, institutional,
    legal, and other social factors and resulting boundaries.

*This definition is an adaption and remix of earlier definitory elements
taken from Veletsianos and Kimmons (2012), Weller (2014), and DeRosa and
Jhangiani (2018).*

##### References

Veletsianos, George and Royce Kimmons. (2012). Assumptions and
Challenges of Open Scholarship. *The International Review of Research in
Open and Distributed Learning*, Vol. 13 (4), 166-89. doi:
[10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1313](https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1313){.external-link
.no-image target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"}.

Weller, Martin. (2014). *The Battle For Open: How openness won and why
it doesn't feel like victory*. London: Ubiquity Press. doi:
[10.5334/bam](https://doi.org/10.5334/bam){.external-link .no-image
target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"}.

DeRosa, Robin and Rajiv Jhangiani. (2018). *What is Open Pedagogy?*
[openpedagogy.org](http://openpedagogy.org/open-pedagogy/){.external-link
.no-image target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"}.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Header image by Yeshi Kangrang on Unsplash.
