Today CWTS published its open science policy on its website. This policy, which formally came into effect on September 1 this year, is the outcome of a co-creation process in which many CWTS colleagues participated in a period of one and a half years. In this blog post, we discuss the why , the how , and the what of the CWTS open science policy.
Toward integration of data, computing, and tools Bibliometrics is often equated with straightforward numerical indicators like publication and citation counts, journal impact factors, and h-indices. Without any doubt these are indeed the most often used items in the bibliometric toolbox. However, the bibliometric toolbox is expanding in a number of important directions.
At CWTS, we have substantial expertise in research evaluation, including academic careers, institutional evaluation, journal evaluation, university rankings, responsibility and engagement, and open science. We regularly reach out to share our knowledge and foster good practice. But do we also ‘practice what we preach’? Are we doing enough to foster an appreciative working culture, to harbour a safe space, and to promote open dialogues?
The value of bibliometric visualizations Bibliometric visualizations are often presented as powerful tools for identifying the key patterns in large bibliometric data sets. However, not everyone is convinced of their value.
The relationship between science and technology There is a recurrent debate about how useful science is for technological innovation. However, science is heterogenous, and some types of scientific outputs may contribute disproportionately to technology.
DARPA is one of many examples of how the entrepreneurial state makes high-risk investments and creates markets. DARPA is often referred to when it comes to funding for missions. It is unique and differs in many ways from traditional research agencies. This blog post illuminates some of its particularities; some inspiring, others just interesting, and again others not so pretty.
Sometimes, bringing home a message requires a more visual approach. That’s why recently, we teamed up with a graphic designer to create an infographic on the h -index – or rather, on the reasons why not to use the h -index.
Previous posts on the Strategy Evaluation Protocol 2021-2027 describe the criteria and aspects and the process and responsibilities. Asking to judge research units on their own merits and putting the responsibility for the evaluation with the research organisations proves quite a challenge. Evaluation might not always happen according to protocol, yet the process itself offers opportunities to reflect and define. And as such it has value.
Personal motivation and information on Train 2 Wind Completing a PhD as member of the Train 2 Wind ITN (Innovative Training Network) combines several of my interests, as it allows me to study scientific collaboration in an applied research setting as part of an international research consortium that trains PhD graduates funded by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action.
This article is an updated version of the webinar report in the ISSI Newsletter (#63, volume 16, number 3). Introduction In this post, we summarize the webinar series “Doing science in times of crisis: Science studies perspectives on COVID-19” and introduce the speakers and presentations. The webinar is embedded into a broaderresearch line on COVID-19 atCWTS.