Here’s the story of my fascination with supramedullary airways over the last 20 years, and how Jessie Atterholt and I ended up working on them together, culminating with her talk at SVPCA last week. (Just here for the preprint link?
My wife Fiona is a musician and composer, and she’s giving a talk at this year’s TetZooCon on “Music for Wildlife Documentaries – A Composer’s Perspective”. (By the way, it looks like some tickets are still available: if you live near or in striking distance of London, you should definitely go! Get your tickets here.) With less than four weeks to go, she’s starting to get nervous — to feel that she doesn’t know enough about wildlife to talk to
Have we ever posted decent photos of the Brachiosaurus altithorax caudals? Has anyone? I can’t remember either thing ever happening.
No time right now for me to dig into the interesting and important discussion on how we should orient vertebrae (here and here so far) – that will be coming soon. In the meantime, here’s something else.
Thanks to everyone who’s engaged with yesterday’s apparently trivial question: what does it mean for a vertebra to be “horizontal”? I know Matt has plenty of thoughts to share on this, but before he does I want to clear up a couple of things. This is not about life posture First, and I really should have led with this: the present question has nothing to do with life posture.
I was lucky enough to have Phil Mannion as one of the peer-reviewers for my recent paper (Taylor 2018) showing that Xenoposeidon is a rebbachisaurid. During that process, we got into a collegial disagreement about one of the autapomorphies that I proposed in the revised diagnosis: “Neural arch slopes anteriorly 30°–35° relative to the vertical”. (This same character was also in the original Xenoposeidon
{.size-large .wp-image-15256 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“15256” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2018/08/25/down-in-flames/enterprise-fiery-reentry-st3/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/enterprise-fiery-reentry-st3.jpg” orig-size=“1024,516” comments-opened=“1”
{.size-large .wp-image-15242 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“15242” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2018/08/21/diplodocus-goes-digital/diplo-mwc-slice-and-volume-2/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/diplo-mwc-slice-and-volume-2.jpg” orig-size=“1918,1053” comments-opened=“1”
{.size-large .wp-image-15233 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“15233” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2018/08/16/ct-scanning-a-caudal-vertebra-of-diplodocus/diplodocus-caudal-ct-1-getting-ready-to-scan/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/diplodocus-caudal-ct-1-getting-ready-to-scan.jpg” orig-size=“2000,1500” comments-opened=“1” image-meta=“{"aperture":"1.8","credit":"","camera":"iPhone
Robin N. Kok asked an interesting question on Twitter: For all the free money researchers throw at them, they might as well be shareholders. Maybe someone could model a scenario where all the APC money is spent on RELX shares instead, and see how long it takes until researchers own a majority share or RELX.