For this forthcoming Barosaurus paper, we would like to include an establishing photo of the AMNH Barosaurus mount. There are two strong candidate photos which we’ve used before in an SVPCA talk, but since this is a formal publication we need to be more careful about copyright.

I was in Philadelphia a couple of weeks ago to work with Liguo Li, of Yongjinglong fame, and I took a day to run up to New York for a quick day’s work at the American Museum of Natural History.

Here is a fascinating sequence of five consecutive posterior dorsal vertebra — AMNH FARB 291 from the“Big Bone Room“ at the AMNH: {.wp-image-14329 .size-full aria-describedby=“caption-attachment-14329” loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“14329” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2017/08/15/biconcavoposeidon/figure-d-lateral-view-dscn6126/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/figure-d-lateral-view-dscn6126.jpeg” orig-size=“2203,754”

{.size-large .wp-image-14018 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“14018” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2017/05/01/guest-post-a-color-coded-model-of-the-amnh-brontosaurus-mount-by-tom-johnson/gedsc-digital-camera-3/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/gedc2019.jpg” orig-size=“4320,3240” comments-opened=“1” image-meta=“{"aperture":"3.6","credit":"","camera":"X5","caption":"GEDSC DIGITAL

Prologue Back when I started writing about issues in scholarly publishing, I would sometimes write about the distinction between for-profit (bad) and non-profit (good) publishers. While I still recognise this as an issue, thinking it through over the last few years has made it clear that this distinction is largely orthogonal to the one that really matters — which is between open and non-open publishers.

Back in 2012, when Matt and I were at the American Museum of Natural History to work on “ Apatosaurus ” minimus , we also photographed some other sacra for comparative purposes. One of them you’ve already seen — that of the Camarasaurus supremus holotype AMNH 5761.

Re-reading an email that Matt sent me back in January, I see this: (For anyone not familiar with the the “wiper”, it refers to a short paper of only one or two pages. The etymology is left as an exercise to the reader.) It’s just amazing how we keep on and on falling for this delusion that we can get a paper out quickly, even when we know perfectly well , going into the project, that it’s not going to work out that way.

{.size-large .wp-image-11937 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“11937” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2015/05/13/the-scale-model-of-the-amnh-apatosaurine-skeleton-amnh-460/amnh-460-skeleton-model-2/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/amnh-460-skeleton-model-2.jpg” orig-size=“2272,1113” comments-opened=“1”

{.size-large .wp-image-11929 .aligncenter loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“11929” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2015/05/09/what-should-we-tell-people-about-the-amnh-apatosaurine/amnh-460-left-anterolateral-view/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/amnh-460-left-anterolateral-view.jpg” orig-size=“2737,1662” comments-opened=“1”

Today is a good day for sauropod science. Since we’re not getting this up until the afternoon, you’ve probably already seen that Emanuel Tschopp and colleagues have published a monstrous specimen-level phylogenetic analysis of Diplodocidae and, among other things, resurrected Brontosaurus as a valid genus.