Tonight, I sent my submission to Research Councils UK in response to their call for comments on the recently issued docment RCUK Proposed Policy on Access to Research Outputs .  I am now posting my comments publicly.

In the middle of February, Times Higher Education ran a piece by Elsevier boycott originator Tim Gowers, entitled Occupy publishing .

In a comment on an previous post, wycx articulated a position that sounds all too familiar: I have heard a lot of people say things like this in the last couple of months.  It makes pretty depressing reading.

{.aligncenter .size-full .wp-image-4516 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“4516” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2011/10/06/on-display-this-weekend-lacms-monster-alligator/giant-gator-1/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/giant-gator-1.jpg” orig-size=“1704,2272” comments-opened=“1”

Preparing a talk is a time-consuming process, and there’s no question that getting the slides ready is where the bulk of that time goes.  But unless you understand exactly what it is that you’re going to talk about, even the best slides won’t rescue your talk from mediocrity, so before you fire up PowerPoint, go and read part 1 of this tutorial, on finding the narrative.  Seriously.

Matt, Darren and I were all in Lyme Regis last week for SVPCA 2011, the Symposium of Vertebrate Paleontology and Comparative Anatomy — an excellent technical conference similar in some ways to SVP, but much nicer because it’s small enough that you can see all the talks and meet all the people.

Last time around, I referred in passing, rather flippantly, to what I called Tutorial n: how to become a palaeontologist .  Since then, I realised that actually I could write a tutorial on this, and that it could be surprisingly short and sweet — much shorter than it would have needed to be even a few years ago. So here it is: how to be a published palaeontologist.

In an interesting comment on Matt’s “Amphiocoelias brontodiplodocus” post, an anonymous commenter wrote (among much else): I started to write a reply to this, then realised it was important enough to merit its own post — so here it is. The amateur and commercial palaeontologists alluded to in the comment are wrong, plainly and simply.

{.aligncenter .size-large .wp-image-553 loading=“lazy” attachment-id=“553” permalink=“http://svpow.com/2008/10/17/apply-for-paleonturology-08-or-else/riodeva-sunset-500/” orig-file=“https://svpow.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/riodeva-sunset-500.jpg” orig-size=“500,375” comments-opened=“1”