Published in Reda Sadki
Author Reda Sadki

Global health continues to grapple with a persistent tension between standardized, evidence-based interventions developed by international experts and the contextual, experiential local knowledge held by local health workers. This dichotomy – between global expertise and local knowledge – has become increasingly problematic as health systems face unprecedented complexity in addressing challenges from climate change to emerging diseases.

References

Improved strategies to counter the COVID-19 pandemic: Lockdowns vs. primary and community healthcare

Published in Toxicology Reports
Authors Konstantinos Farsalinos, Konstantinos Poulas, Dimitrios Kouretas, Apostolos Vantarakis, Michalis Leotsinidis, Dimitrios Kouvelas, Anca Oana Docea, Ronald Kostoff, Grigorios T. Gerotziafas, Michael N. Antoniou, Riccardo Polosa, Anastastia Barbouni, Vassiliki Yiakoumaki, Theodoros V. Giannouchos, Pantelis G. Bagos, George Lazopoulos, Boris N. Izotov, Victor A. Tutelyan, Michael Aschner, Thomas Hartung, Heather M. Wallace, Félix Carvalho, Jose L. Domingo, Aristides Tsatsakis

Community health workers and Covid-19: Cross-country evidence on their roles, experiences, challenges and adaptive strategies

Published in PLOS Global Public Health
Authors Solomon Salve, Joanna Raven, Priya Das, Shuchi Srinivasan, Adiba Khaled, Mahwish Hayee, Gloria Olisenekwu, Kate Gooding

Community health workers (CHWs) are a key part of the health workforce, with particular importance for reaching the most marginalised. CHWs’ contributions during pandemics have received growing attention, including for COVID-19. This paper contributes to learning about CHWs’ experiences during COVID-19, based on evidence from India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Kenya and Ethiopia. The paper synthesises evidence from a set of research projects undertaken over 2020–2021. A thematic framework based on the research focus and related literature was used to code material from the reports. Following further analysis, interpretations were verified with the original research teams. CHWs made important contributions to the COVID-19 response, including in surveillance, community education, and support for people with COVID-19. There was some support for CHWs’ work, including training, personal protective equipment and financial incentives. However, support varied between countries, cadres and individual CHWs, and there were significant gaps, leaving CHWs vulnerable to infection and stress. CHWs also faced a range of other challenges, including health system issues such as disrupted medical supply chains, insufficient staff and high workloads, a particular difficulty for female CHWs who were balancing domestic responsibilities. Their work was also affected by COVID-19 public health measures, such as restrictions on gatherings and travel; and by supply-side constraints related to community access and attitudes, including distrust and stigmatization of CHWs as infectious or informers. CHWs demonstrated commitment in adapting their work, for example ensuring patients had adequate drugs in advance of lockdowns, and using their own money and time to address increased transport costs and higher workloads. Effectiveness of these adaptations varied, and some involved coping in a context of inadequate support. CHW are critical for effective response to disease outbreaks, including pandemics like COVID-19. To support CHWs’ contribution and protect their wellbeing, CHWs need adequate resources, managerial support, and motivation.